al Qaida, terrorism, Homeland Security, "Dirty bombs" and others
are new words in our society that have quickly imbedded themselves
into the consciousness of most Americans. Citizens are quickly
adopting the notion they are constantly inundated with "nothing
will be the same after 9/11"? we have no "choice" but to go along!
But, do we?
we ready now to allow one "criminal" event (non-state sponsored)
to convince us to abandon centuries of principles and common sense,
and endorse or acquiesce to a new round of "rules and regulations"
in a New World Order setting? Is this reaction truly what is necessary
to preserve freedom or will it, as many (including us) believe,
serve a few to erase valuable restrictions upon our government,
resulting in more abuses of its citizens?
rights of citizens of each and of the several states are protected
by federal and state constitutions from infringement. The
rights of "other classes" of people, such as U.S. CITIZENS,
are not so protected. The determination of which class you belong
to is up to you. The "choice" is voluntary!
the Social Security Administration's Q&A publication #05-10023, "Social Security Numbers for Newborns", the question is asked: "Must my baby have a Social Security number"? No! Getting a social
security number for your baby is strictly voluntary. We can't blame them for not telling us the truth. But are we listening?
Do we care? Do we ever consider the long-term consequences of
the short-term needs we are usually convinced are important?
Security is a "voluntary" system in that no one is required
to get a number. However, "programs which use Social Security
numbers for control purposes might not allow a person without
a Social Security number to participate." (Letter of January
10, 1986 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Social
Security Administration) See, "Social
Security---The Way Out."
consequence of this double standard is that the government and
its officers can profess allegiance to the Constitution while
avoiding its restrictions, by presuming that all
people are of the "unprotected" class of "person," and
who may be manipulated at will because of a staged event
such as 9/11: by congress or by the United Nations, by the President,
by "Homeland Security,"? or by whoever? right down to
local law enforcement!
individuals, "don't despair!" they tell us, but our nexuses join
us to a type of "New World Order Slavery" that keeps our "foot
to the pedal, and our pedal to the metal." Most people are unable
to take time to think of the options and choices that are otherwise
before us in not volunteering and in not going along with the "status quo." Our choices and options of "un-volunteering" are
seldom ever exercised. "They" put a carrot before us and
we follow! Minimum-wage people are requesting (demanding)
our Social Security numbers? and citizens are handing it over? just
as long as they get what "they" want. Today, fictions are
manipulating the American mind and pushing the envelope, exploiting
the "human rationale." Where are we letting others
take us? When do we say no more, and mean it? Was the time then,
or is it still now to oppose this modern-day slavery? See,
Social Security?"Pathway to Peril?
many years, individuals calling themselves "patriots" have been
researching how and why the government has gotten out of the people's
control. Their findings have revealed one core factor: We The
People have taken our "status" for granted! While
pursuing a life based upon benefits for privileges, we have reduced
our vigilance against acts which metamorphose citizens into slaves.
The "status" of "The People" has changed.
every state has two Constitutions. Find out where to find them;
then, read them. If you know nothing else, know the law you rely
upon to protect you.
A reading of the US Constitution is also
advisable. This restricts the "states" and others from
infringing on your rights. The Declaration of Independence may
enlighten you regarding the circumstances under which the colonists
separated from England. You will see frightening parallels to
today; except, instead of opposing a foreign nation, the People
of America today should be examining their relationship to the
"foreign corporation" called the "United States" government.
| 1 |
2 | 3 |